The Chapel Hill News Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Register / Log In
High: 43°
Low:  26°
35.0 °
5-Day Forecast
Search:  Site  Archives 

News Home / News  

Business | Carrboro | Chapel Hill | Chatham | Crime | Hillsborough | newsobserver | Schools | University

Published: Feb 19, 2012 02:00 AM
Modified: Feb 17, 2012 05:17 PM

Advisory group says website isn't way to probe raid
Councilman 'fully swayed'
 
Story Tools
  Printer Friendly   Email to a Friend
  Enlarge Font   Decrease Font
  del.icio.us   Digg it

tool name

close
tool goes here
LEARN MORE

For information about the committee, its members and meetings go to www.townofchapelhill.org/index.aspx?page=1703


More News
Crowd protests school language cuts
Bassett: Growth could ease tax burden
OWASA to hold budget hearing Thursday
Council delays grievances discussion
Lucky 13 cycle cross country for cancer center

Most Popular

CHAPEL HILL - The town's new police advisory board voted 8-1 last week to reject the Town Council's request to use a website to solicit comments on the Yates Motor raid.

The Community Policing Advisory Committee, which had asked for an outside investigator to look into the Nov. 13 raid, said a website would not produce reliable information.

After listening to the committee Wednesday night, Town Council member Jim Ward, who was among those who had supported the website, said he was "fully swayed" by its objections.

"I'm convinced it's not the way to go," he said.

Committee member Jessica Smith, an attorney who had proposed the investigator, said the website would not help establish a factual record of events on which to base policy recommendations, the group's main charge.

"It makes no sense for me to review something you have absolutely no means to test the veracity of," she said. "This proposal is just one step further down the road of degraded information."

Committee chairman Ron Bogle said no process is perfect and even an investigation by an outsider would be a "random process" because the investigator could not compel testimony.

But a website, he and the committee agreed, might make trying to understand the raid even harder, because people could anonymously say whatever they want as many times as they want.

"Quite frankly I think it's just going to lead to more community upset," Smith said. If the town thinks it needs to create a website for political reasons, it should do so, she said, but that doesn't mean it will be getting a factual account of what happened.

"It gives a false sense of doing something that we're not," she said.

Committee member James Kitchen cast the dissenting vote, suggesting even anonymous comments might have value.

The council had asked the committee to work with town staff on a website that could let witnesses provide information without identifying or incriminating themselves. The latter concern was one reason the town gave for rejecting the investigator request.

But Town Council member Laurin Easthom, who also attended Wednesday's meeting, reminded the committee that the town left the door open to reconsidering an investigator if the committee felt substantial gaps remained after it reviewed the incident.

"Don't forget that that option still exists," she said. "It is a part of the resolution, and it does exist."

Eight charged

Police led by a Special Emergency Response Team charged eight people with misdemeanors in the November raid, after a group of self-described "anti-capitalist occupiers" entered the building at 419 W. Franklin St. and announced plans to turn it into a community center with a proposed daycare, clinic and beds for the homeless.

The raid, in which police pointed assault rifles and guns at people's heads, has divided the community. Some say police overreacted. Others defend the response, saying the activists were on private property and no one got hurt. Town Manager Roger Stancil and Police Chief Chris Blue have said the raid gives the town and police a chance to improve policies for handling future incidents.

Instead of working with the website, the advisory committee agreed to tell the Town Council it wants to work with a consultant the town has hired to review policies and recommend changes.

Committee members Roscoe Reeve and Smith came up with 10 initial areas they'd like the committee to examine:

Civil disobedience

Equipping and deploying the SERT

Securing an incident site

Dealing with the media

Protocols for supervision and decision making

Intelligence gathering and threat assessment

Mutual assistance plans

Internal investigations by both the town and police

Internal and external communication during incidents

Communication with town advisory committees

Ward encouraged the committee to be active players.

"I would like to have you ask that you be part of this process, that you are not just sitting on the sidelines," he said.

Chief Blue, who also attended the meeting, said he and the consultant will update the committee at its March meeting.

Schultz: 919-932-2003
advertisements
  Triangle Member Newspapers:    The News & Observer   |   The Chapel Hill News   |   The Cary News   |   The Durham News   |  Eastern Wake News   |  The Herald   |  North Raleigh News
  © Copyright 2013, The News & Observer Publishing Company, a subsidiary of The McClatchy Company

  Help | Contact Us | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Copyright | About our ads | Parental Consent | N&O Store | Advertising
Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com