The Chapel Hill News Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Register / Log In
High: 43°
Low:  26°
35.0 °
5-Day Forecast
Search:  Site  Archives 

Front Home / Front  



Published: Jul 20, 2012 12:24 PM
Modified: Jul 20, 2012 12:25 PM

Crowd protests reassignments
Board weighs teachers’ appeals in closed session
Students and other supporters reach out to shake teacher Bert Wartski's hand at Thursday night's Chapel Hill-Carrboro school board meeting.

 
Story Tools
  Printer Friendly   Email to a Friend
  Enlarge Font   Decrease Font
  del.icio.us   Digg it

tool name

close
tool goes here

Superintendent’s letter

Dear Chapel Hill High School Faculty and Staff

I hope your summer finds you enjoying the break from routine and that you have been able to relax and enjoy the season. The purpose of this letter is to provide you with information regarding the current issue of teacher transfers.

As I stated at my meeting with you in June, I believe that the four pillars of a successful school include a clear vision, outstanding leadership, high quality instruction, and a positive school culture. Each one of these ingredients impacts the other. In short, all of these pillars need to be in place if a school and/or school district are to reach its potential in terms of student achievement.

My intent during my two spring visits with the faculty was to address the issue of culture. It was clear to me from feedback provided by you on both index cards you submitted and from the NC School Climate and Culture Survey that a climate/culture problem exists at the school. I also shared that I felt that as the superintendent I could not sit on the sidelines and not address an issue that has existed for a number of years at the school.

To address the problem a number of transfers were pursued. To be clear some of the individuals to be transferred either left the district or they took care of their assignment in some other manner. In addition, the decisions to transfer some individuals were based on my opinion after a year of observing, listening, and talking with staff members from CHHS, district staff, former staff members, parents, and SIT members. The decision was not about punishing individuals who “speak their minds about school or district policies.” In all cases the individuals to be transferred were notified in a face to face meeting.

In a collaborative culture it is important that everyone feel it is safe to voice their opinions without fear of reprisal. I want to be clear that the transfer decision was not about instruction nor was it about speaking one’s mind but rather it was about placing individuals in the right place in order to take advantage of their skills and talents. Of utmost importance was providing the best opportunity for the school to create a positive school culture.

Also, it is not my intent to implement any further involuntary transfers for the 2012-13 school year. My hope is that with a new principal who has a focus on vision, leadership, instruction and culture, CHHS will become a school that achieves at even

Sincerely,

Thomas A. Forcella

Superintendent


More Front
UNC to stage emergency drill Wednesday
2 Rogers Road plans proposed
State budget holds fate of county’s prison
Gay and Gray gathering set
Town to discuss towing, cell phone rules
Autopsy: Huffing spray killed UNC junior
Appeals court rules fired Chapel Hill workers should get hearing
Police academy offers new perspective

Most Popular

CHAPEL HILL - Two Chapel Hill High teachers protesting their involuntary transfers will learn this week whether they’ve got to go.

The Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools Board of Education deliberated the transfers in closed session Thursday night. Teachers Anne Thompson, Bert Wartski and their lawyer discussed the transfers with the board and administrators, but no decision was announced. The teachers will receive a letter of notification within seven days.

Administrators say the transfers were not punitive, but they have caused a stir among faculty members and students. About 80 people attended Thursday’s meeting to protest the reassignments.

Dianne Jackson, president of the district’s Federation of Teachers, told the board the transfers were “detrimental to the climate of the school.”

Wartski, an A.P. Biology teacher who has spoken out against policies in the past, has said he believes his transfer is punishment for speaking out.

A letter from Superintendent Thomas Forcella (see page3A) said his decision was not punitive.

“It absolutely is,” said Thompson, an Honors English teacher who has been at the high school for 26 years.

Current and former students, parents, and fellow staff members echoed that belief at Thursday’s meeting.

“It is very disheartening when those people (who) go out of their way to speak out … have their voices cast aside,” said Alex Werden, the rising student body president of Chapel Hill High.

Jackson said that based on working with Forcella, she was confident that Wartski’s transfer “was not to silence staff or to serve as retaliation.”

However, Jackson said, the involuntary transfers will have the effect of intimidating other staff members and creating a culture “where speaking up was viewed as problematic.”

Jackson cited examples, without giving names, of staff members threatened with insubordination. People commenting at Board of Education meetings are asked not to identify students or faculty members by name.

Chairwoman Mia Day Burroughs reminded attendees of this policy, a sticky wicket given that the Town Hall chamber was packed with students and parents who had come to support Wartski, the district’s Honor Teacher of the Year in 2009-10.

“This teacher was a positive influence in my education, as well as my development as a critical thinker,” said Jennifer Strange, an elementary school teacher in the district and former student of Wartski. “This teacher taught me that high school was not about your GPA, but about a love of learning and an understanding of what you have learned.”

Adrienne Duffield, a resident anesthesiologist at UNC Hospitals, credited Wartski, her high school biology teacher, with pushing her into a career in medicine.

“I think there is one person in this room who is responsible,” she said. “And other than my parents, I think can say that he is the single most important person in becoming who I am.”

Based on input

While some think the transfers were intended to silence outspoken teachers, Forcella has said the decisions were based on “significant input” from school leaders and staff.

Former Chapel Hill High Principal Jesse Dingle invited him to talk with faculty in April about the school’s climate, he has said. The first official announcement was at a May 16 faculty meeting.

In his letter to Chapel Hill High faculty and staff Thursday morning, Forcella wrote the transfers were not about punishing individuals who speak their minds about school or district policies, but about creating a positive culture.

“I want to be clear that the transfer decision was not about instruction nor was it about speaking one’s mind but rather it was about placing individuals in the right place in order to take advantage of their skills and talents,” the letter said. “Of utmost importance was providing the best opportunity for the school to create a positive school culture.”

Forcella said he does not intend to implement further involuntary transfers.

Meanwhile, the district is closing in on a new principal to replace Dingle, who left this spring. Roughly 18 people have applied for the post, and interviews could begin in a few days, Forcella has said.

‘Awfully vague’

Trey Tanner, Wartski and Thompson’s lawyer, addressed the board during its public comment session. He was speaking, he said, as a parent of children in the school district.

“There’s this overwhelming amount of community support; I think you can see it,” he said, gesturing to crowd that had stood up against the transfers and applauded statements in support of Wartski.

“There’s nothing in their personnel files; there’s no indication of grievances with other staff members,” Tanner said. “(The administration has)) been awfully vague in identifying how this is for the welfare of the school”

As they waited for the board to weigh the matter during closed session, Thompson said she did not want to change schools and teach a new subject assigned by the school district.

“My passion is British literature; they’re trying to take away my passion,” she said. “I’ve spent 34 years building my curriculum.”

Wartski has also been assigned to teach a new subject, environmental science, which Tanner says he has no experience teaching.

Hartwell: 504-251-6670
advertisements
  Triangle Member Newspapers:    The News & Observer   |   The Chapel Hill News   |   The Cary News   |   The Durham News   |  Eastern Wake News   |  The Herald   |  North Raleigh News
  © Copyright 2013, The News & Observer Publishing Company, a subsidiary of The McClatchy Company

  Help | Contact Us | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Copyright | About our ads | Parental Consent | N&O Store | Advertising
Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com