The Chapel Hill News Thursday, May 23, 2013
Register / Log In
High: 43°
Low:  26°
35.0 °
5-Day Forecast
Search:  Site  Archives 

Chapel Hill Home / News / Chapel Hill  



Published: Aug 20, 2012 07:44 AM
Modified: Sep 18, 2012 11:44 AM

Local woman not protected by immigration policy change
Sumedha Gupta

 
Story Tools
  Printer Friendly   Email to a Friend
  Enlarge Font   Decrease Font
  del.icio.us   Digg it

tool name

close
tool goes here
More Chapel Hill

Most Popular

CHAPEL HILL - A policy change that could defer deportation for an estimated 1.2 million young people brought to the United States against the law appears to rule out a local woman whose parents brought her legally.

Sumedha Gupta plans to returns to India on Tuesday, a country she left just shy of her fourth birthday 19 years ago. The aspiring filmmaker is one of an unknown number of foreign-born children who age off their parents’ visas.

The change in immigration policy covered young people who entered the country illegally before June 15 or whose lawful immigration status expired by then.

Gupta’s legal status did not expire until July 28, according to the family and an immigration document.

“It makes no sense to expel talented young people, who, for all intents and purposes, are Americans,” President Obama said in June. The new policy lets those brought here before their 16th birthday and who meet other conditions ask to stay an additional two years and apply for work authorization.

In a speech, the president said he hoped the measure would serve as a bridge to passage of the DREAM Act, which would provide a path to citizenship for those who qualify.

‘On my way out’

Gupta, who turned 23 Saturday, was already planning to leave the country once the year after college plus 60 days the government gives immigrant students like her ended July 28.

She and her parents, Rajneesh and Nutan Gupta of Chapel Hill, put that plan on hold when Obama announced the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. But Aug. 3, the federal government clarified that the policy change applies only to those who were here illegally by the June 15 cut-off. Gupta was still a legal resident at that time, she said.

“I’m on my way out,” a resigned Gupta said last week. “But just because I’m on my way out doesn’t mean this shouldn’t be brought to light. It is a broken system.”

Rajneesh Gupta said immigration lawyers advised their daughter to leave the country because staying could make it harder, if she ever left, to get back in. They’ve since contacted federal lawmakers.

“Cases like hers, they live in the bureaucratic cracks,” Rajneesh Gupta said. “They don’t get noticed.”

In a statement a spokesman for U.S. Rep. David Price said the congressman’s office is gathering information.

“On Ms. Gupta’s behalf, Rep. Price will be asking USCIS (U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services) to explore whether her case is a candidate for prosecutorial discretion, which the agency has exercised in the past in cases where an individual poses no threat to public safety or national security,” spokesman Andrew High said.

“(Price) believes the Administration’s Deferred Action plan was the right thing to do,” High continued. “But there’s no question this case further highlights the need for comprehensive immigration reform.”

‘East of Eden’

Gupta says she knew she wanted a career in moviemaking at 17, after seeing James Dean in “East of Eden.”

She wants to tell stories and says she has a lot to tell. A two-year stay, she said, could help give her the work experience she needs to apply to film school and someday for permanent legal residence.

She’s still hopeful but is not taking any chances.

“I don’t think I’d be deported, but I don’t ever want to get to that point,” she said.

“I am going to be an American one day, but it’s going to take a long time under this immigration system,” she said.

A spokesman for USCIS said he did not know how many young people brought here legally like Gupta might be affected by the federal policy change. He said he could not comment on her case, but repeated that the office, part of the Department of Homeland Security, prioritizes its efforts.

“As part of DHS’ overall effort to focus enforcement resources on the removal of individuals who pose a threat to public safety or national security, ICE has the authority to exercise prosecutorial discretion on cases that do not fall within the Department’s priorities,” Peter Boogaard said by email.

“That said, only Congress can provide a permanent solution to fix the broken immigration system,” he said.

Schultz: 919-932-2003
advertisements
  Triangle Member Newspapers:    The News & Observer   |   The Chapel Hill News   |   The Cary News   |   The Durham News   |  Eastern Wake News   |  The Herald   |  North Raleigh News
  © Copyright 2013, The News & Observer Publishing Company, a subsidiary of The McClatchy Company

  Help | Contact Us | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Copyright | About our ads | Parental Consent | N&O Store | Advertising
Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com