The Chapel Hill News Saturday, May 25, 2013
Register / Log In
High: 43°
Low:  26°
35.0 °
5-Day Forecast
Search:  Site  Archives 

Front Home / Front  



Published: Oct 17, 2012 07:03 PM
Modified: Oct 17, 2012 07:04 PM

Transit plan meets public eye
Voters weigh tax for bus, light rail system
 

 
Story Tools
  Printer Friendly   Email to a Friend
  Enlarge Font   Decrease Font
  del.icio.us   Digg it

tool name

close
tool goes here

TRANSIT SERIES

Bus and Light Rail Plan

Today: What’s driving the plan, how much will it cost and how will we pay for it?

Sunday: Local and regional leaders say sustainable growth is the linchpin in the transit plan.

Oct. 24: What makes N.C. 54 a better choice for the light-rail route than U.S. 15-501?

Oct. 28: How will the plan be put into action and what are the local issues?

Oct. 31: What’s in it for rural voters and those that use on-demand services?


More information

Light-Rail Transit vs. Bus Rapid Transit

A key issue in the regional transportation discussion has been whether Orange County should focus more on traditional bus systems, bus rapid transit or light rail transit.

Light-rail transit (LRT) is not quite a commuter train system but has a little more oomph than a streetcar. Modeled on European systems that offer more capacity and faster service, LRTs underwent a revival in the United States in the 1970s. Today there are 36 light-rail systems nationwide and more than 400 worldwide. LRTs feature low floors, simpler fare systems and flexible, expandable transportation. The trains are guided by an overhead electric line, either along a fixed track or city streets, traveling at up to 55 mph. Each stop connects riders with traditional commuter trains, streetcars and buses to outlying areas.

Bus rapid transit (BRT), on the other hand, is a high-capacity, lower-cost bus transit solution. It operates on roadways or dedicated lanes, which speeds up the delivery of more passengers to their destinations without putting more buses in the traffic flow. They also are more reliable and accessible than traditional buses, offering improved stations, fare collection and technology.

Over the long haul, however, transportation experts say light rail is better than traditional buses or bus rapid transit for several reasons:

• More people can travel on each train than on each bus – even Chapel Hill’s larger, articulated buses. It also costs less to add a new car to a train than to put another bus on the road.

• Light rail uses electricity; buses use gas, the cost of which can be unpredictable and rise rapidly.

• Light rail takes people off the pavement. While buses carry more people, they still use roads and create congestion.

• Light rail corridors create situations in which more dense development can flourish.

• Although a bus system is less expensive to start, it is more expensive to operate. The cost of operating light rail is generally 25 percent less than the cost of a typical bus system

• Light rail reduces personnel costs, because one driver can handle several rail cars rather than one driver per bus.


More information

Plan Timeline

Triangle Transit’s regional transportation plan, which includes the Durham-Orange Transit Plan, isn’t the first plan for a bus and rail transportation network. That was in 1995.

Here are the highlights since that time:

• 2006: The plan is dropped, because of changing federal standards and high construction costs

• 2007: The Special Transit Advisory Commission – a group of Triangle leaders – conceives a new regional bus and rail plan

• July 2009: The Legislature gives Orange, Durham and Wake counties the authority to impose a half-cent sales tax to fund public transit improvements

• 2009: The Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro and Capital Area metropolitan planning organizations adopted the new plan and start refining the eastern and western legs of the network

• June 2011: Durham County Commissioners approve the Durham Bus and Rail Investment Plan

• November 2011: Sixty percent of Durham voters pass a half-cent sales tax to fund the plan

• May 2012: Durham and Orange commissioners sign a cost-sharing agreement with Triangle Transit that outlines each partner’s financial responsibilities

• Oct. 2: Orange County Commissioners sign off on the Orange County Bus and Rail Investment Plan and an Interlocal Implementation Agreement with Triangle Transit and the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization

• Oct. 10: The DCHC-MPO adopts both plans

• Oct. 18-Nov. 6: Voters will decide whether to pay a half-cent sales tax to help pay for the plan


More Front
Residents to council: Restore Chapel Hill library hours
Farmers growing new lives from old ways
County weighs options for new jail
Chatham school board vacancy creates rift
East Chapel Hill High students, event offer help to Burmese classmates

Most Popular

CHAPEL HILL - By 2035, the Triangle will be home to more than 2.1 million people trying to get to work, school and other destinations using crowded highways and byways.

A two-part bus and light rail transportation plan – and a half-cent sales tax to help fund it – is the key to controlling and directing the effects of future growth, regional leaders say.

At its heart, the plan is an economic one, laying the foundation for a network of dense residential and commercial corridors. A side benefit is giving residents and visitors another way to go places – potentially with less congestion and air pollution.

“We’ve got growth coming,” says Wib Gulley, general counsel for Triangle Transit, a former state senator and Durham mayor. “The real question is how we accommodate those folks – either through sprawl or high-density corridors.”

While most experts agree the economic goals are central to the plan, not everyone thinks it will have a significant effect on congestion and pollution.

Chapel Hill transportation planner David Bonk said there aren’t any definite numbers yet – or a method for evaluating the plan’s potential. But even if it doesn’t directly cut congestion, the light rail could have an indirect effect by freeing up other heavily-traveled corridors. Many Chapel Hill area drivers use alternate routes now to avoid N.C. 54, he said.

“The benefit may not be in the end that actual congestion is reduced, but that it gives people other options to avoid the congestion,” Bonk said.

Big price tag

The plan’s costs are extraordinary – $1.4 billion for a 17.3-mile light-rail line that in 2026 could link UNC and its hospitals in Chapel Hill to Duke University, the medical center and Alston Avenue in Durham – and roughly $14.44 million each year to pay for operating and maintaining it.

The local leg is part of a planned 57-mile light and commuter rail network connecting Orange and Durham counties to Research Triangle Park, Raleigh, Cary, Apex and Wake Forest. The plan doesn’t include Carrboro, or Raleigh-Durham International Airport.

The second part of the plan – expanded bus service – will be more immediate. In Orange County, the capital cost is estimated at nearly $50 million, with annual operating and maintenance costs of roughly $4.6 million.

Area leaders have cobbled together a mix of 25 percent local, 25 percent state and 50 percent federal monies to pay for light rail. The bus plan would use 80 percent federal dollars and the rest in state and local funding.

Orange County residents will decide in early voting beginning Thursday through Election Day, Nov. 6, whether to pay a half-cent sales tax (5 cents on a $10 purchase) for the new services.

State lawmakers gave Durham, Orange and Wake counties permission to add the tax in the 2009 Congestion Relief and Intermodal Transport Fund Act. Durham County voters passed a half-cent sales tax last year to raise roughly $625 million by 2035; Wake County Commissioners decided not to hold a sales tax referendum.

The tax won’t apply to food, medicine, health care, housing or gas. But it does ensure that visitors and commuters from other counties who add to local congestion also pay, Chapel Hill Mayor Mark Kleinschmidt said.

Flexible plans

Orange County’s share of the light rail price tag is based on the 4.3 miles of the system in southern Chapel Hill. The local cost is about $104.6 million, with $3.5 million each year in operation and maintenance costs. Durham County will pay $1.05 billion to build around 13 more light-rail miles and $11.3 million for annual operations and maintenance.

Local leaders also approved a $10 increase in the vehicle registration fee to pay for existing bus services. An extra $7 for Orange County will bring in $22.5 million through 2035; $3 will be added to Triangle Transit’s existing $5 fee to pay for the increasing cost of its services.

Residents will see immediate results in the expanded bus routes, more frequent stops, consistent hours, and night and weekend service. The plan adds routes to regional bus service, too, including an express bus connecting Mebane, Hillsborough and Durham.

No state or federal funding has been secured yet, but Triangle Transit has applied for the Federal Transportation Administration’s New Starts program for capital projects. One requirement is that local land-use plans support growth along corridors with multiple transportation options.

If state or federal funding falls through, Bonk said the plan could be postponed until they find funding or make another plan. Kleinschmidt said one idea is to use sales tax and vehicle fee revenues to add more bus service – including bus rapid transit on major highways.

Step by step

For now, only one bus rapid transit line is planned – on Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, from Eubanks Road to UNC Hospitals. The $24.5 million project is five to 10 years away, with a tentative start date in 2019.

Hillsborough will see big changes in 2015, when a long-planned, $8.9 million Amtrak rail station would be built. The station, near the intersection of Churton Street and U.S. 70-A, would be part of a mixed-use development, possibly with police and fire stations, a civic arts center, businesses and apartments.

The light rail system is the last part of the plan and won’t be built until the money is in place, officials said. Construction could begin by 2020, with an inaugural run set for 2026.

The trains would run along an overhead electric guidewire, either on a fixed track or city streets. The trains would travel up to 55 mph, stopping at 17 stations near major shopping, education and employment areas. The entire run, including stops, could take about 35 minutes, and weekday trains would run 18 hours a day.

The system should show the potential for 1,000 boardings a day to qualify for funding, Triangle Transit officials said. They anticipate exceeding 14,000 daily boardings by 2035.

Grubb: 919-932-8746
advertisements
  Triangle Member Newspapers:    The News & Observer   |   The Chapel Hill News   |   The Cary News   |   The Durham News   |  Eastern Wake News   |  The Herald   |  North Raleigh News
  © Copyright 2013, The News & Observer Publishing Company, a subsidiary of The McClatchy Company

  Help | Contact Us | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Copyright | About our ads | Parental Consent | N&O Store | Advertising
Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com