The Chapel Hill News Saturday, May 25, 2013
Register / Log In
High: 43°
Low:  26°
35.0 °
5-Day Forecast
Search:  Site  Archives 

Guest Columns Home / Opinion / Guest Columns  



Published: Jan 05, 2013 07:00 PM
Modified: Jan 05, 2013 04:46 PM

A start to sane gun rules
g8ytjm89
Rob Schofield

 
Story Tools
  Printer Friendly   Email to a Friend
  Enlarge Font   Decrease Font
  del.icio.us   Digg it

tool name

close
tool goes here
More Guest Columns

Most Popular

It’s only been a matter of weeks since a pathetically troubled young man dipped into his mother’s arsenal and changed our world at Sandy Hook Elementary School, but already there has been an outpouring of pent-up passion and persuasive analysis from scores of insightful political leaders, advocates, journalists, bloggers and average citizens. Across America, millions have stood up to echo the president’s conclusion in his unforgettable memorial speech in Newtown, Conn.:

“We can’t tolerate this anymore. These tragedies must end. And to end them, we must change.”

Happily, it appears the nation is actually awash in rational voices on this matter. Smart people know we must do much more and are saying it publicly. Add to this reality the news of some encouraging national poll numbers and it’s not impossible to see a path forward in which the real and meaningful gun regulation advances.

What’s missing in all this, of course, is the same thing that’s missing in so many critical public policy debates for those who would give voice to rational, common-sense solutions for the problems that ail us: money.

This sounds crass, but it’s true. The hard reality of the gun debate in the United States right now is this: On one side stands a passionate core of people for which guns are the one and only issue. They live and breathe guns “24-7” and contribute huge sums of money to the lobbying and political groups that concoct ever more extreme positions and supposed threats to justify their own existence.

And what stands on the other side? Truth be told, it’s not much: A smattering of well-meaning anti-violence groups, an array of progressive nonprofits for which gun violence is one of 27 or so issues, some public health and law enforcement officials and a handful of courageous political leaders. The truth of the matter is that while Americans want stricter gun control by a wide margin, for most of them, guns are not a single-issue passion as they are with the pro-gun crowd.

The results of this mismatch are predictable: the NRA and its allies rule the roost. Rather than working to combat gun violence and save innocents as has been done so effectively in so many other countries through sane gun regulations, elected officials fall all over themselves in their efforts to pledge fealty to the gun lobby and compete to see who can spread guns – even the concealed variety – into more and more places.

So could a large influx of anti-gun violence money really change this equation? Could it actually help bring about a meaningful shift in the attitudes of our elected leaders—one big enough to force genuine enforcement of the entire Second Amendment (you know, including the part about “a well-regulated Militia”??

The answer here is an unequivocal “yes.”

The playing field

Right now, the playing field isn’t just tilted; it’s not even a competition. Anti-gun violence advocates in North Carolina don’t have a crew of lobbyists, a team of lawyers, a fleet of writers and thinkers to help inform public opinion or a team of grassroots organizers like the pro-gun crowd..

And while an influx of money could not establish such an infrastructure overnight, it could certainly make an enormous difference in reasonably short order.

So, could this happen? If so how? Well, right now, the man heading Mayors Against Illegal Guns, Michael Bloomberg, is worth something like $25 billion. He seems like a person capable of funding the effort on a national basis. One percent of that fortune would go a long way toward getting the job done.

But he’s far from the only one. Bill Gates wants to improve the nation’s schools, right? How about starting by keeping the kids and teachers in them alive?

Let’s hope that, in the months ahead, the plain truth of this potential solution to our national crisis begins to dawn on some of America’s more open-minded plutocrats. It may not be the most wholesome or inspiring solution to the problem, but at this point, who cares? Right now our children and teachers are being murdered. If we can save some lives by simply buying our politicians back from the gun crowd, let’s get started immediately.

Rob Schofield is the director of Research and Policy Development at N.C. Policy Watch.
advertisements
  Triangle Member Newspapers:    The News & Observer   |   The Chapel Hill News   |   The Cary News   |   The Durham News   |  Eastern Wake News   |  The Herald   |  North Raleigh News
  © Copyright 2013, The News & Observer Publishing Company, a subsidiary of The McClatchy Company

  Help | Contact Us | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Copyright | About our ads | Parental Consent | N&O Store | Advertising
Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com