The Chapel Hill News Sunday, May 19, 2013
Register / Log In
High: 43°
Low:  26°
35.0 °
5-Day Forecast
Search:  Site  Archives 

University Home / News / University  



Published: Jan 22, 2013 07:00 PM
Modified: Jan 22, 2013 01:10 PM

Leaders see Gig-U as path to opportunity
 
Story Tools
  Printer Friendly   Email to a Friend
  Enlarge Font   Decrease Font
  del.icio.us   Digg it

tool name

close
tool goes here

What’s next

Chapel Hill and Carrboro have authorized their staffs to start accepting bids Feb. 1 from service providers who could design, build, install, operate and manage a complete ultra high-speed network. A decision tentatively is scheduled for October.

The towns cannot establish a franchise or require service providers to meet specific goals. They and UNC hope to leverage their existing infrastructure to interest potential providers. That leverage includes available fiber-optic lines, antenna space on three OWASA water tanks and UNC data centers. The towns’ network also lies near the N.C. Research and Education Network high-capacity line on the UNC campus.

The vendors are being asked to design networks for at least one multi-family dwelling, the downtown business district, a business park, a public housing development, and/or a residential neighborhood.

The regional Gig-U – University Community Next Generation Innovation Project – is a collaboration between 10 N.C. Next Generation Networks partners: Chapel Hill, Carrboro, UNC and UNC Health Care; Durham and Duke University; Cary, Raleigh and N.C. State University; and Winston-Salem and Wake Forest University and Medical Center.


More information

Broadband laws

• Video Services Competition Act, which in 2006 banned all municipal franchising of new cable systems and required cable providers to get a state franchise instead of a local one. The act also removed once-standard provisions, such as rate regulation and build-out and minimum system capability requirements.

• Statutes restricting the local franchising and regulation of broadband systems that do not carry traditional video programming. These laws state broadband is an unregulated service and providers must operate under a state-granted “certificate of convenience and necessity.”

• The federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 removes barriers to broadband services at the state and local level and prohibits most state and local regulation.

• Level Playing Field/Local Government Competition Act, which in 2011 barred most local governments from offering traditional cable or advanced broadband retail systems to paying customers. It does not prohibit local governments from leasing municipal broadband systems, dark fiber or other facilities to a third party for operations.

• N.C. cities and towns can offer broadband service if it’s free, provided to other government bodies, such as school systems and transit agencies, or used to operate smart-grid utility services and remote utility and parking meter reading capabilities.


More University

Most Popular

CHAPEL HILL - Local leaders took the first step last week toward routing ultra high-speed Internet service to every home and business in Carrboro and Chapel Hill.

The regional North Carolina Next Generation Networks project – Gig-U – is part of a national collaboration between 37 universities and the communities that surround them. While the regional partners in Orange, Durham, Wake and Forsyth counties are working together to find service providers, each will sign its own contract for a community network.

Gig-U’s ultra high-speed network would move information and upload data at 1 gigabit per second – more than 100 times what most people have now.

The prospect of closing the digital divide in low-income communities, providing equal access to jobs and education, and accelerating health care and economic opportunities is exciting, local leaders said.

The only thing standing in the way is how to enforce Internet service contracts.

As a Dillon’s Rule state, North Carolina narrowly defines its municipalities’ powers. Telecommunications attorney Cynthia Pols told the Chapel Hill Town Council last year that state laws regulating cable and broadband services have become stricter, and local governments can’t create franchises or put binding requirements on providers.

Pols and Catharine Rice, president of the SouthEast Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors, said the towns would be on shaky legal ground if they tried to require open access, customer discounts or wiring in certain neighborhoods. The companies know the contracts aren’t enforceable, so the towns should be clear about their goals, Rice said.

“We’re just a little bit worried that everybody, in their excitement to make this happen, doesn’t want to deal with these issues,” she said. ”We just want you to look at it and figure out a way to bring us all a gig.”

Town officials think they can attract providers, but they won’t know for sure what’s possible until the proposals are on the table, Chapel Hill Town Manager Roger Stancil said. There are any number of options for how they eventually could proceed with a contract, he said.

Potential incentives include low-cost leases for municipal facilities and 46 miles of mostly unused fiber-optic cable. Chapel Hill and Carrboro installed roughly 144 strands of fiber last year along major roadways as part of a traffic signal technology upgrade. About 8 percent, or 12 lines, could be used as a dedicated ultra high-speed network through some of the most dense local neighborhoods, officials said.

“This has a huge capacity to do some really great things in the future,” Stancil said.

Rice suggested the towns consider establishing a nonprofit group to make sure promises are kept, but UNC project manager Terri Buckner said the town managers were not interested. Several project members did see it as a long-term option, Buckner said.

Carrboro Town Manager David Andrews said they might be willing for a nonprofit to serve lower-income neighborhoods, but it’s important to maintain local control.

“We would not be comfortable in turning over the assets to a single entity, such as an authority or a nonprofit ... because of the differences in values and the differences between one city or another,” he said.

Carrboro Mayor Mark Chilton had another suggestion: Add a clause that voids the contract if objectives aren’t met or the courts say it’s unenforceable.

This project is about creating opportunities, he said.

“The next great wave of innovation can very easily come from people who simply have a great idea, but it has to be a great idea that is combined with access to technology,” Chilton said.

Grubb: 919-932-8746
advertisements
  Triangle Member Newspapers:    The News & Observer   |   The Chapel Hill News   |   The Cary News   |   The Durham News   |  Eastern Wake News   |  The Herald   |  North Raleigh News
  © Copyright 2013, The News & Observer Publishing Company, a subsidiary of The McClatchy Company

  Help | Contact Us | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Copyright | About our ads | Parental Consent | N&O Store | Advertising
Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com