|
|
|
|
Published: Jan 10, 2007 07:50 AM
Modified: Jan 10, 2007 07:50 AM
Your Letters
God had a need for a 'chosen people'I want to share what for me is a new perspective on being a Jew and one of the "chosen people." We Jews are uncomfortable that our "chosenness" reflects some supposed "superiority," but this morning's reading, together with a long-term interest in religion and God, gave me a new understanding of who I am as a Jew and, more importantly, who God is.The new foundation for my self-understanding rests on the biblical assertion that it was God who chose the Jews. God took the initiative. Why the Jews were chosen is necessarily speculative. Indeed, Moses acknowledges that the distinction of the Israelites lies not in who they were before Sinai and the giving of the covenant, but only after it. He asks, "Is it not in Thy going with us, so that we are distinct, I and Thy people, from all other people that are upon the Earth?" (Ex. 33:16)Why the Jews were chosen is one thing; more importantly, why was any people chosen? For me the answer is to be found in God's need for us. God needed a people to carry out his plan for how we were to live. He couldn't do it alone. Neither, in my view, omnipotent nor omniscient, he was dependent on us to bring his vision of "the good life" to fruition. An omnipotent God would have needed no assistance. We Jews were to try to project his vision in our daily lives, to reflect his concern for justice, righteousness and mercy. We were to be the players who tried to act out his script. In this context, the emergence of the prophets can be seen as God's need to periodically remind us of our failures in doing as we were bid. And in this context, I can now see Jesus and Mohammed as prophetic carriers of this message with Jesus giving particular emphasis to "love" and Mohammed to "justice."A good morning's work! -- George S. Baroff, Chapel Hill
I am writing in response to Jesse James Deconto's Jan. 6 article, "Developers heading north."My wife and I moved from downtown Raleigh to the Northwood neighborhood in Chapel Hill about a year ago. Northwood is a quiet, well-established, formerly rural neighborhood bounded by Eubanks Road, Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard and Weaver Dairy Road. As such, it will be affected greatly by the impending development in the area.I understand that not all of the proposed development in the northwest area will occur at the same time (per Phil Post's comments) -- and that it may not necessarily occur as proposed -- but it will most certainly occur to some extent or other. The Weaver Dairy Road/MLK Boulevard intersection is already an ugly traffic mess at peak periods without ground having been broken on any of the proposed developments. Said developments will only exacerbate the problem, and will further choke up MLK Boulevard's intersections with Perkins Drive and Eubanks Road just to the north and closer to Interstate 40.We in Northwood already risk our lives trying to cross MLK by foot to get to shops and services at Chapel Hill North, often making driving a more desirable option. What makes sense about getting into a car and traveling less than half a mile just to cross a road? Future developments along Eubanks and to the west of MLK will be faced with the same limitations and barriers, made worse by increased traffic.Since the development is certainly coming, shouldn't it come in the context of thoughtful planning that will take into account the unwieldy increase in traffic, severe lack of existing pedestrian access, and the gobbling up of open space in the area? That's what I'd like to see, and I'd like to think that the Town Council would agree with Del Snow's proposal to form a Northwest Planning Committee. It's not too late to avert this disaster. -- Christopher A. Clemmons, Chapel Hill |